Constructivism Approach Essay Example for Free

Constructivism Approach EssayFor purposes of discussion the Constructivism Approach is chosen to further dissect the importance of chat in law enforcement. There ar various intercourse strategies around however, Constructivism seems most ideal for the communication requirements of highly stressful situations present in law enforcement. The Constructivism Approach to communication was first introduced by Jesse Delia in 1982 (Bentley). The start is based on the 1967 Jean Piagets learning theory of nameivism.The learning theory proposes that passel are able to contour line meaning in situations by applying known information structures stored through historic experiences. In other words, this theory proposes that a person, through influences of culture, experiences, beliefs and background form information structures that serve as the framework for responding to situations. Additional information may be acquired but this frame of thought usually body constant. Using this as basis for his approach, Delia describes Constructivism in communication as being rooted individually and constructed socially.This approach poses that a person makes sense of the world though systems of personal constructs (Constructivism). It is the ability of one to align culture, learning and communication in responding to situations. Constructivism of Delia is essentially concerned with the cognitive processes that precede the actual communication (Delia, OKeefe and OKeefe). The approach looks into the exchange of information amidst the communicator and the receiver and the multiple truths that go along with it.A full-blooded exchange therefore depends greatly on the ability of the communicator to send information that a receiver disregard creatively interpret and understand with consideration to complexities of messages (Delia, OKeefe, and OKeefe). Constructivism further poses that meanings evolve and change (Bentley). by social interactions, constructs are created and imp ressions and interpretations are learned. Meaning in this instance is socially shared. Both communicator and receiver are influenced by a small portion of their personal constructs in interpreting events.The constructivist believes that the complexities in interpersonal cognitive exchange is highly dependent on how advanced a persons social-cognitive functioning is. basically this proposes that the more a person develops sophistication in cognitive functioning, the more likely this person lead be able to stir the flow of communication towards a more substantial route. The constructivist also believes that the construct system of a person generates communication-and goal-oriented beliefs (Delia, OKeefe and OKeefe).These beliefs provide a guided discernment of situations to form a strategic behavior towards them. And since communication is basically a field that is founded on persuasion, acquiring a sophisticated construct system is imperative. At the same measure a person possessi ng complex cognitive functioning is most likely to produce person-centered messages that create a more engaging exchange between two people. This is beneficial when applied to situations that prove to be tense or at the least taxing.The teaching of Constructivism as an approach to communication is that it is socially developed however individually founded. People develop their ascertain of constructs based on their exposure to culture, beliefs, experiences and background. These constructs are relative to the person and are as diverse as the general population. Having said that, how then would Constructivism help in law enforcement? In the previous paragraphs several examples of new-made documentation of police brutality were sited.There are several common threads in these examples. However, leash of the most common of these threads will be discussed for this paper. First is race. Many of these recorded incidents involve racial minorities. The United States plays host to many adu lt immigrants, often who are unable to speak English. Moreover, usually immigrants work their own communities wherein the use of their mother tongue is prevalent. Therefore, older immigrants have a more difficult time adapting to the new language. Interaction with other races becomes an ordeal.